Florence Planning Debate Widens as Prosecutors, City Hall and Civic Groups Step In

After months of growing public discussion over major real estate projects, Florence’s municipal administration has opened a broader political reflection on the city’s urban development strategy.

What initially emerged as criticism surrounding a single building project has progressively expanded into a wider conversation about how Florence manages growth, heritage protection and housing. In recent weeks, that discussion has formally reached City Hall and now involves prosecutors, opposition parties and civic groups.

City Hall opens internal review

Sara Funaro, mayor of Florence, convened the city’s executive, majority councillors and district presidents at Palazzo Vecchio for a closed-door meeting to review the Piano Operativo Comunale (POC), the city’s main urban planning framework regulating land use and building projects.

The POC came into force six months ago. The meeting was presented as an opportunity to assess its implementation and to strengthen communication with residents in the coming months through neighbourhood meetings.

Among the key financial elements discussed were the so-called “monetisations” linked to private developments under the POC, estimated at around €47 million. According to the administration, these resources will be directed towards public housing. Officials indicated that the funds could allow the renovation of up to 1,900 existing ERP (Edilizia Residenziale Pubblica) flats or the construction of 308 new units.

Other issues addressed included the Green Plan, tighter rules on short-term tourist rentals and a provision requiring private developments larger than 2,000 square metres to allocate 20% of the surface area to controlled-rent housing for 20 years.

The decision to dedicate an entire majority meeting to urban planning signals that the issue has become a central political dossier.

From public criticism to judicial scrutiny

The turning point in the debate came last summer, when residents began questioning the impact and approval process of the building complex commonly known as the “Black and White Box” or “Black Cube”, constructed on the site of the former Teatro Comunale in Florence’s UNESCO-listed historic centre.

As the discussion intensified, Florence prosecutors opened an investigation.

Twelve people are currently under investigation, including municipal planning officials, a member of the Soprintendenza — the state authority responsible for protecting cultural heritage — members of the landscape commission active between 2015 and 2020, and representatives of the property ownership. The alleged offences include falsification of documents, building violations and breaches of Italy’s Cultural Heritage Code. The investigation is ongoing.

The case has become a reference point in the broader discussion about planning procedures and oversight.

Political and civic pressure

Opposition parties have called for a formal debate in the City Council on major urban transformations, arguing that projects with long-term structural impact require transparent institutional discussion.

Sinistra Progetto Comune has proposed a temporary suspension of significant urban transformations approved in recent years. Centre-right groups have asked the mayor to report formally to councillors on key projects, including the redevelopment of the former Officine Grandi Riparazioni (Ogr) railway workshops at Porta al Prato.

At the same time, architects and civic associations have advanced their own proposals.

The Fondazione Italiana Bioarchitettura has suggested a temporary moratorium on major projects and a revision of the current POC. Laboratorio per la Città has called for an 8–10 month suspension of procedures involving public assets and for the drafting of a new public housing plan.

Some members of historic Florentine families have launched a petition asking the municipality to reconsider the redevelopment of the ex Ogr site, proposing instead a cultural and landscaped project connected to the Teatro del Maggio and Leopolda area.

Student housing and market pressure

The debate also intersects with the rapid growth of private student residences.

According to Corriere fiorentino, Florence now counts 12 private student housing facilities. The latest, in the Firenze Nova district near Rifredi station, offers around 200 rooms for approximately 400 beds, with monthly rents starting at €850 for a shared room and €990 for a single room of about 12 square metres.

Student organisations and local committees argue that many of these facilities target a high-income segment and risk accelerating housing pressure in the city. The administration maintains that increasing supply — including through controlled-rent requirements in private developments — forms part of a broader housing strategy.

A wider reflection on Florence’s future

The current debate unfolds in a context of rising real estate values and sustained tourist pressure. Housing affordability, demographic shifts and the balance between conservation and economic development have become recurring themes in public discussion.

What began as a controversy over a single project has evolved into a more comprehensive reflection on Florence’s development model. For the first time in years, the city appears to be re-examining the trajectory of its urban policies — including decisions and strategies adopted over the past decade or more.

Whether this reflection will translate into concrete changes remains to be seen. What is clear is that Florence has entered a phase in which the direction of its growth, and the balance between private investment and public interest, are once again at the centre of political and civic debate.

(Cover image by Dominick Vietor from Pixabay)

❤️ Support Florence Daily News

If you liked this article, please consider supporting Florence Daily News.

We are an independent news site, free from paywalls and intrusive ads, committed to providing clear and reliable reporting on Florence and Tuscany for everyone.

Your support — whether a one-time gift or a regular contribution — helps us stay independent and keep telling the stories that matter.

Donate securely via Stripe below.