Trump’s New Tariffs Feel Like an Embargo—and China’s Ready

Throughout history, high tariffs and embargoes have rarely been just technical tools of trade policy. At best, they’ve been ineffective and quietly repealed. At worst, they’ve acted as powerful forces of transformation—reshaping not only markets, but also cultures, habits, and geopolitical balances. And almost never in the intended direction. What starts as a bid to protect domestic interests often ends up changing the daily lives of millions in ways policymakers neither planned nor controlled.

From Tea to Coffee: When Trade Turns Cultural

In 1773, a British tax on tea sparked outrage in the American colonies. The protest culminated in the Boston Tea Party, when rebels tossed entire shipments of taxed tea into the harbor. But it wasn’t just an act of political defiance—it marked the beginning of a cultural shift. Tea, once a daily ritual inherited from Britain, fell out of favor. Coffee quickly rose in its place, becoming the beverage of choice for the new American identity. A tax had changed more than trade—it had reshaped a nation’s tastes.

Napoleon’s Embargo: Strategy Gone Wrong

Just a few decades later, in 1806, Napoleon Bonaparte tried to weaponize trade on a continental scale. His Continental System aimed to block British goods from entering Europe and to cripple the British economy. Instead, it caused shortages, encouraged smuggling, and weakened Napoleon’s own allies. Far from toppling Britain, the embargo ended up undermining France’s economic stability.

Jefferson’s Embargo: Isolation and Collapse

In 1807, U.S. President Thomas Jefferson attempted a similar tactic. Hoping to keep America out of the Napoleonic Wars, he enacted a full embargo on American exports. But instead of pressuring Britain and France, the measure devastated U.S. port cities, tanked trade revenues, and was widely ignored. It was repealed within two years and is now remembered as a failed experiment in economic diplomacy.

The 1930s: When Protectionism Deepened a Global Crisis

In 1930, at the height of the Great Depression, the U.S. passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, raising duties on more than 20,000 imported goods. Meant to shield domestic industry, the law backfired. Trading partners retaliated, global commerce collapsed, and the depression worsened. The episode remains a textbook example of how protectionism can deepen a crisis rather than resolve it.

The Oil Embargo of 1973: Energy as a Weapon

Fast forward to 1973, when Arab members of OPEC imposed an oil embargo on the U.S. and parts of Europe in response to their support for Israel. Oil prices quadrupled almost overnight. Western economies stalled. Fuel rationing, inflation, and long queues at gas stations became part of daily life. Beyond the economic impact, the embargo triggered permanent shifts in energy policy and global power structures.

July 2025: Trump’s Tariffs as a De Facto Embargo

That history feels suddenly urgent again. On July 11, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump sent a letter to European leaders announcing that, starting August 1, the U.S. will impose a 30% tariff on all European goods—not just cars, but also wine, cheese, machinery, textiles, and more. The justification: defending American workers. But the warning was clear—if the EU retaliates, tariffs will rise to 60%.

At these levels, tariffs are no longer just trade tools. They become de facto embargoes, especially in consumer markets where a 30–60% price increase makes foreign products uncompetitive overnight. And as history shows, this kind of economic pressure rarely stays economic for long.

Cultural Shifts and Global Consequences

Just like in 1773, when Americans turned from tea to coffee, consumers today will adapt. If European goods become too expensive, people will look elsewhere. New habits will form, new suppliers will emerge, and cultural landscapes will shift.

And while much attention is focused on the confrontation between the U.S. and the European Union, the real winner could once again be China.

At first glance, China is also exposed to high tariffs—many of which were already imposed during Trump’s first presidency. But the real impact is far less severe than it would be in Europe. There are several reasons for this. First, many Chinese exports are low-cost goods, from electronics components to fast fashion. Even a 100% tariff on a €3 phone case or a €12 t-shirt barely alters consumer behavior.

Second—and more importantly—China operates within a state-driven economic model. Unlike Europe or the U.S., where private companies directly bear the brunt of trade restrictions, Chinese firms benefit from direct government support, subsidies, and strategic backing. In a capitalist democracy, tariffs lead to layoffs, losses, and political pressure. In China’s state capitalism, the government absorbs part of the economic shock to preserve long-term influence.

When Two Fight, China Wins

This structural resilience gives China an enormous advantage in a prolonged trade war between Western blocs. While the U.S. and EU lock horns, China can quietly consolidate market share, offer alternatives, and deepen its presence in both developed and developing economies.

And China is no longer confined to low-end manufacturing. The country has invested massively in sectors once dominated by the West. A striking example is higher education: a decade ago, Chinese universities were almost entirely absent from global rankings. Today, several institutions—including Tsinghua, Peking, and Fudan—are climbing steadily among the world’s best, especially in science, engineering, and technology. That momentum reflects a broader trend: China is becoming not just a supplier, but a serious competitor in knowledge, innovation, and soft power.

Meanwhile, traditional European sectors—like Italian wine, French cosmetics, and German machinery—risk a double blow: losing access to the U.S. market and facing increased pressure from Chinese competitors at home. And American consumers may soon find that the “alternatives” on their shelves carry not just a different flag, but a different set of rules and ambitions behind them.

Tariffs Change More Than Trade

The lesson is clear: tariffs change more than trade. They alter the flow of goods, the habits of consumers, and the balance of power. Imposed in the name of sovereignty, they often end up shifting it elsewhere. What we eat, drink, wear, and use becomes a matter not just of choice, but of strategy.

Tariffs and embargoes are not neutral tools. They may be introduced in the name of security or fairness, but they often trigger profound and lasting changes—not just to economies, but to how people live, what they consume, and ultimately, who they trust.

Support Florence Daily News

Florence Daily News is an independent news site covering the stories, culture, and life of Florence and Tuscany. We don’t rely on clickbait, invasive or hidden advertising, or paywalls. Instead, we believe in quality journalism that respects our readers and serves those who care about thoughtful, local reporting.

If you value our work, consider supporting us with a donation.

Donate securely via Stripe below.